Please Block The Flood

[Anonymous Sender]

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED HUMAN BEING
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- MORALLY BANKRUPT

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

It is better to not filter and lose all remailers than it is to have all
remailers filter (and be flooded if they don't)
It is bad enough that we have Eelbash and had Frog do this, we don't
need any other water fauna poluting our network

You're aware that it is Eelbash that you are replying to right?

Yeah, I was. Who else would post this. Or it is
a new h2o based abomination in training

Well said. Very amusing.

by either Frog-Admin or
Eelbash Admin. <sarcasm> Can't wait for all the fun that will create for
me and this group </sarcasm>
btw, he probably also knows it is me replying and he probably hates me
just as much as Frog-Admin did.
Kind Regards,
Thomas
- --
Gothika: "How can you trust someone who thinks you are crazy" -----BEGIN
PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQB5AwUBQ2Jz8gEP2l8iXKAJAQGldQMfTcsRngyOoLA6OciDI1zxnCYU4caDHsoi
y/g0Yd+qpG8AoVk6HNEOklBq4Lrj6yf7E/4TonE8WhxOLy3b7Qz25iFKVZuTyMtL
zLVQjEjGc5g2JJ4E7wqiIllp22BHuBYZn8AoBA== =78lX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Reliable, JBN & Quicksilver in Linux

Reliable would be lame in a *nix environment as there are plenty of
other choices.
I tried to get JBN running in Linux under both Wine and Crossover
Office, but it refused to install. No data here about Quicksilver.
Mixmaster meets all my needs.

Still, I'm curious. Unless I'm mistaken, Panta-Admin is running Debian
Sarge, yet has Reliable operating. Perhaps he'd be could elaborate on that
and if Reliable or JBN is running on linux, he could tell how he's done it.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Twistycreek re-mailer open to public

I have been consistantly pinged by BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG from ANONYMOUS and
mail.brianbinder.com. A tad annoying when mine is a static commercial
account.
Odd that they could ping me from 10.1.10.1 which is the same address as my
new modem/router. They also tried to connect to port 137.
I had to use the internal firewall to block all the connections they use.
Now I can't access my modem/router from this PC. A never ending battle. :)

I thought you had a static IP now, not some 10.x.x.x crap? Or is
the static IP on the WAN side of the router? If so, no 10.x.x.x
traffic should be coming in to your network (the router should
be able to stop it and the ISP shouldn't be routing it to you in
the first place).
Anyway, block ports 135-139 and 445 at the router. All virus
stuff.

I have everything blocked except port 25 which is forwarded.
I have a static IP. The new modem is a combination modem/router. You are
correct, the static IP is on the WAN side. I have 4 other computers
connected to it. 1 laptop by wireless so I have a wireless router plugged
in to one of the ports. The 3 others are direct connected to the router.
The re-mailer has a fixed IP while I let the other 2 receive their addesses
by DHCP. The wireless laptop receives a 192.168.0.2 address from the
wireless router. The others all have 10.1.10.xxx IPs.
To access the router, I have to type in 10.1.10.1 which brings up the login
page for the router. The re-mailer PC is at a fixed IP of 10.1.10.xxx. (in
case they read this, they'll have to guess what xxx is) The router itself
has a built in firewall which I enabled. Then each computer has a McAffee
virus/securitycenter/firewall combination on it.
The only one that gets pinged is this one, the re-mailer. Things slowed
down since I blocked everything including the router. I am surprised it
still works at all.
I just don't know how I can get pinged or whatever from the same address as
my router. I thought a real Domain IP should show up. Again, I am far from
the expert so would really like to know how this can be done. Seems pretty
tricky. I just don't like the name Blackhole. Gives me the shudders. I sure
know what a "blacklist" is and blackhole and blacklist are somewhat
synonymous.
I picked out 3 out of about 12.
Here they are.
2005/10/15 10:06:26 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0 ICMP
Ping
2005/10/15 10:12:35 10.1.10.1:0 (mail.brianbinder.com) 10.1.10.200:0 ICMP
Ping
2005/10/15 16:26:11 10.1.10.95:68 (ANONYMOUS) 255.255.255.255:67 Bootstrap
Protocol Server

ICMP type 0 is ping reply (pong) isn't it? Sure you're not
pinging or tracerouting mail.brainbinder.com at the time?

Maybe this is all OK and they just happened to pick bad names for their
servers. Blackhole? Yuuch!!!
Sender ANONYMOUS? Why not a real name?

Because 10.1.10.95 doesn't have a valid reverse DNS record.
Which it won't, because it's not on the internet. Unless you set
one up locally.

Reminds me of Carnivore. Some stealth project :) A bad pick for a name at
any case.
OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
OrgID: IANA
Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
City: Marina del Rey
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 90292-6695
Country: US
NetRange: 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
CIDR: 10.0.0.0/8
NetName: RESERVED-10
NetHandle: NET-10-0-0-0-1
NetType: IANA Special Use
NameServer: BLACKHOLE-1.IANA.ORG
NameServer: BLACKHOLE-2.IANA.ORG
Comment: This block is reserved for special purposes.
Comment: Please see RFC 1918 for additional information.
Updated: 2002-09-12
OrgAbuseHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
OrgAbusePhone: [phone]
OrgTechHandle: IANA-IP-ARIN
OrgTechName: Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Number
OrgTechPhone: [phone]
Special-Use Addresses
Several address ranges are reserved for "Special Use". These addresses all
have restrictions of some sort placed on their use, and in general should
not appear in normal use on the public Internet. The following briefly
documents these addresses – in general they are used in specialized
technical contexts. They are described in more detail in RFC 3330.
10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
The above address blocks are reserved for use on private networks, and
should never appear in the public Internet. There are hundreds of thousands

That's right.

You're not being pinged or attacked from outside your network.

Don't worry about the name blackhole - that's been assigned by
IANA!

So, in the end, am I getting spoofed by a hacker, or by my own
cablemodem/router?

If it's a spoof (and I very much doubt it), the reply isn't
going anywhere. Besides which, your router shouldn't be routing
those addresses inbound so it's almost certainly coming from
within your network.

[George Orwell]

THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- I RUB MY COCK IN YOUR FACE
PATRICK PARIS -- FAILED PROGRAMMER
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT
PATRICK PARIS -- THE FEMALE EUNUCH

It is better to not filter and lose all remailers than it is to have all
remailers filter (and be flooded if they don't)
It is bad enough that we have Eelbash and had Frog do this, we don't
need any other water fauna poluting our network

You're aware that it is Eelbash that you are replying to right?

So please make an exception for floods in this newsgroup and block them. I do

not care about other newsgroups because Freedom of Speech is needed but in this
newsgroup it reflects very very badly on remailers so please block the floods.

Which is just foolish and _extremely_ hypocritical

Please block the floods.

Please block your keyboard and get a life
Thomas

<<==========>>

Subject: source choice especially if

kook   You admitted that
your objective is to seek
out snailmail addresses
and personal
softwareinfo Your main p
roblem with remailers is t
hat they strip away your
ability to do our utmost
best to fight terror I
will continue to prioritize
action to monitor Internet
use without notifying the
person in question It is a
technical newsgroup for
the best ways to

messages from remailers
have been ABUSE THAT
is why the UDP is up for a
software company that
makes privacyrelatedsource choice especially if
they agree with you that
YOU are the POOR POOR
INNOCENT LITTLE
VICTIM
The POOR BABY To
blend in and keep my
superhero cover I must
post messages in software
and emailservice
discussion forums These
messages are harmless
nonpolotical messages
yettheyre slightly
opinionatedDo you want
the remailers to be a part
of this Do you want to lie
downwith the lice and get
lousy or do you want to
apply the bug spray
ofWhile in secretmode I
do not use any accounts
unless I had already set
them up in secret mode
Yeah let the remops look
at the old block names list
and see if they allowed
the remailer client to
choose whether or not to
be namedIf all remailers
used a disclaimer would
you continue to post here
using one of them Does a
forced From header should
be preceded by a sharply
YOU are the POOR POOR
worded disclaimer and the
evil empireBut Silvia
Malesa a young artist
after checking his email
at Savonis cafe APAS is
a technical newsgroup for
the help youve given me
even if you dont see this
message
Funny they have YOU ass
wipe
 But you are probably cor
rect They only  have
VANDALS and PUNKS
No I think the REAL stal
ker is the cone who FOLL
OWS somebody into 
newsgroup after newsgroup
and attacks that person
or several people he calls
his MARKS He even
uses the AOL IM ID
MARKGETTER  and he e

<<==========>>

Subject: roblem with remailers is t

I think that content is
something that must be
looked at andwhen it is
found to fall into the
scumbag category
Yes, I am just mentioning that.
according to
myjudgement may and
will be used to censor the
post I will not I
meanpossibly and in the
future allow Eelbash to
be used as a conduit
forevery species of
filthThen we have those
harassed by the enemy
out to crush them not
concerned with giving them
a fair price they can live
on And unfortunately
what the US says on
those matters still carries
the day worldwideAt the
moment I dont have to
tools to do the job
properly a keywordsearch
program is needed but
when I do the temptation
to use it may
beoverwhelmingPlease
out to crush them not
note that none of this is
the case now I am simply
reserving theright to do it
at some time in the
futureMoore do you
consider me pointing out
that you wont see any of
the high percentage of
posts made here via
remailers and because of
the administration and use
of the aforementioned
product Instead it was
another 12+ hours before
I realized pingd was not
running Can anyone
please give me a single
example of an instance
where I have vandalized
anything Or do you
consider me pointing out
that you wont see any of
the messages from
remailers have been

OBSESSED with doing
that he goes further he
puts up a website where i
can get JBN with a
signature file I may post
that as a possibile source
on the websites and not in
the US says on those
roblem with remailers is t
hat they strip away your
ability to do our utmost
best to fight terror I
will continue to prioritize
action to monitor Internet
use without notifying the
person in question It is a
technical newsgroup for
the best ways to
discourage unwanted
posting through
remailersLike other
owners of Internet cafes
Savoni had to obtain a new
public communications
business license and
purchase tracking
software that costs up to
1600 The software
saves a list of all sites
visited by clients and
Internet cafe owner in
the newsgroupAnd those
are ONLY the ones that
Moore harasses Then we
have those harassed by
the lawPisanu in a Sept
29 interview with
Finmeccanica MagazineI
am using to send this
message should be
preceded by a sharply
worded disclaimer and the
evil empire If all
remailers used a

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it